State v. Valeros.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold in this ease that the failure of Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawai'i (the prosecution) to disclose an alibi-rebuttal witness was a violation of Hawai'i Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 12.1, 1 even though the witness had been previously listed as the alibi witness of Petitioner/Defendanh-Appel-lant Brandon Valeros (Defendant), but apparently unbeknownst to Defendant became the prosecution’s witness. Hence, in the absence of a showing of good cause under HRPP Rule 12.1(f) for granting an exception to the requirements of HRPP Rule 12.1, it was error…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul's Electrical Service, Inc. v. BefitelHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. Ah ChoyHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DowsettHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Tetu.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Ngo.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013