Legal Opinion

State v. Tetu.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2016No. SCWC-13-0003062PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

POLLACK, J.

TMs case presents the question of whether a defendant charged with committing a criminal offense on private property has a right to visit the ciime scene. We hold that the constitutional provisions providing for effective assistance of counsel and a fair trial afford a defendant, subject to appropriate restrictions, with the right to access the scene of the alleged offense.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Circuit Court Proceedings

On March 25, 2010, at about 2:00 a.m., a surveillance camera filmed Robert Tetu, who was wearing a backpack, entering the uninhabited basement area…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thomas v. McGinty (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. Loher.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  3. United States v. BullcomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  4. Batalona v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Maddox v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API