State v. Tetu.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
POLLACK, J.
TMs case presents the question of whether a defendant charged with committing a criminal offense on private property has a right to visit the ciime scene. We hold that the constitutional provisions providing for effective assistance of counsel and a fair trial afford a defendant, subject to appropriate restrictions, with the right to access the scene of the alleged offense.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Circuit Court Proceedings
On March 25, 2010, at about 2:00 a.m., a surveillance camera filmed Robert Tetu, who was wearing a backpack, entering the uninhabited basement area…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Thomas v. McGinty (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Loher.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- United States v. BullcomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Batalona v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
- Maddox v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.