Legal Opinion

Matheson v. Matheson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 29, 1908PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Buena Yista District Court.— Hon. A. D. Bailie, Judge. Actiow in equity to establish the plaintiff’s rights in certain lands, and for partition. Decree as prayed, and defendants, except Buena Vista county, appeal.—

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J.—

The evidence shows with but little substantial dispute the following facts: On March 1, 1894, Samuel Matheson, being then somewhat advanced in age, married the plaintiff herein. On June 25, 1905, the said Matheson died intestate, leaving the plaintiff, his widow, and several children by a former marriage his heirs at law. Prior to the date of his marriage, the deceased owned a quarter section of land in Buena Vista county, upon which there was a mortgage indebtedness of $600 owing to the school fund of said county. Shortly before his marriage to plaintiff, Matheson visited the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Brown v. WesterfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. White v. WattsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Ring v. LundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Chapin v. NottIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rule v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Arndt v. LapelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Kyle v. KyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Pennington v. Woodner-McgaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Davis v. John E. Brown CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API