Pennington v. Woodner-Mcgaugh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Dewey County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by T. C. Pennington against Ed. Woodner-McGaugh and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
The sole question to be determined in this case is whether or not the defendant in error Rohena Woodner, alias Rohena McGaugh, who was the widow of William Woodner, alias William Mc-Gaugh, and as such claimed the right to possess and occupy the lands in controversy as a homestead, until otherwise disposed of according to law, in accordance with the terms of section 6328, Rev. Laws 1910, had waived and abandoned her right to possess and occupy such homestead. It appears that the defendant in error Rohena Woodner, alias McGaugh, after the death of her husband had filed her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Matheson v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Bacus v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Funk v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Miller v. HassmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gassin v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- In Re Estate of GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- In Re Carothers' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Ward v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.