Legal Opinion

Taft v. Taft

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1886PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Error to Macomb. (Stevens, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, O. J.

Plaintiff, as one of the children and heirs-at-law of Aden Taft, deceased, brought ejectment for an undivided share of two parcels of land owned by his deceased father, which defendant, another son, claims as grantee. One parcel he claims under a deed made by Aden Taft, but held in his own control until death. The other he claims under a deed from said Aden Taft, alleged to have been deposited in escrow with Charles F. Mallory, who delivered it to defendant after his father’s death.

Upon the trial the whole controversy turned upon the validity of these two deeds. The court, as…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wheelwright v. WheelwrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Jackson ex dem. Russell v. RowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Prutsman v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Souverbye v. ArdenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  5. Hatch v. HatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Nolan v. OtneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. May v. EmersonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Davis v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  5. Powers v. RudeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API