Legal Opinion

Ring v. Lund

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 14, 1906PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeals from Mitchell District Court.— Hon. J. E. Clyde, Judge. These, are appeals from proceedings in probate; the first being an appeal by Lund, administrator, from an order of court, rejecting certain claims made by him for expenses incurred in administering the estate of Sam Ring, deceased; and the second, an appeal by Lund who, in his individual capacity, filed a claim against the estate of said Ring. This claim was disallowed by the trial court.—

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

June 10, 1903, A. N. Lund was appointed administrator of the estate of Sam Ring, deceased, and on September 9, 1904, he filed his final report in which he made a statement of his receipts and expenditures. To some of the items for which he asked credit, Peter and N. P. Ring, heirs of the deceased, filed objections upon the ground that they were unauthorized in view of the fact that he had an opportunity to sell all the property of deceased on July 22, 1903, for full value, to N. P. Ring, which opportunity he refused and neglected to avail himself of. The claim which he filed against the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Estate of MerkelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Hancox v. . MeekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Ward v. TinkhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Roaf v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Tayloe v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Leach v. BeazleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Matheson v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. In re Estate of WorkmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Bookhart v. YoungloveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. First Trust & Savings Bank v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API