Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1943No. 35,491PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an action for the recovery of damages for failure to comply with the terms of a written contract for the drilling of an oil and gas well, in which the defendant, Fred Meyer, recovered a judgment on his cross petition, alleging fraud, for part of the purchase price paid by him for certain oil and gas leases transferred to him by plaintiff under contract.

The petition was lengthy. Pertinent portions thereof were in sub*430stance as follows: The plaintiffs at all times material were the joint owners of a block of oil and gas mining leases,-…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Zinn ex rel. Zinn v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. McIntosh v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Tawzer v. McAdamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Lewis v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Balano v. NafzigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PonterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. State v. RowlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Snedker Ex Rel. Snedker v. Derby Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Haynes v. HockenhullNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Sanders v. SittonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API