Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Hockenhull

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1964No. 7369PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAVEZ-, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment arising out óf an action based on negligence.

Beginning in 1958, Morrison-Kaiser F & S Construction Co., hereinafter referred to as Morrison-Kaiser, the prime contractor, began construction of Navajo Dam in San Juan County, New Mexico. Defendant Miles Sierra Contractors, hereinafter referred to as Miles Sierra, was under subcontract to Morrison-Kaiser, which contract called for Miles Sierra to remove some 3,800,000 cubic yards of dirt. In the performance of this contract, a road was ■constructed which was called the “main haul [Hall]” road and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reed v. StyronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Southern California Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Signa v. AlluriAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  4. Swanson v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. McClelland v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KendallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Embrey v. GalentinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mireles v. BroderickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Wilson v. HaynerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Kinney v. LutherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API