Legal Opinion

Hjermstad v. Barkuloo

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1954No. 9206PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE FREEBOURN:

This is an action to have a warranty deed, wherein plaintiff and appellant, S. L. Hjermstad, and his wife, as parties of the first part, conveyed certain real property in Great Falls, Montana, to defendant and respondent, Laura Lee Barkuloo, as party of the second part, declared a mortgage.

The trial court in its judgment found that plaintiff had failed to prove the allegations of his complaint, and ordered the “case be dismissed and that defendant have judgment against the plaintiff for her costs * *

From such judgment Hjermstad appealed.

The pleadings and undisputed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Escallier v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Lee v. Stockmen's National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Roy v. King's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Grindrod v. Anglo-American Bond Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Gray v. GrantMontana Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Brown v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Quinn v. BriggsMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Riley v. ByrneMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Montana Bank of Red Lodge, N.A. v. LightfieldMontana Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API