Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Briggs

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1977No. 13354PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

Plaintiff brought this action in the district court, Beaverhead County, in equity to rescind a contract, to recover $100,000.00 in payments and to cancel a promissory note for $150,000.00. Defendants counter-claimed seeking enforcement of the $150,000.00 promissory note and attorney fees for defense of the contract. The district court ordered rescission of the contract, restitution of the $100,000.00 in payments, cancellation of the promissory note and denied defendants any recovery on their counter-claim. The controlling issue is whether plaintiff is entitled to relief on the ground of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hjermstad v. BarkulooMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Ferd L. Alpert Industries, Inc. v. Oakland Metal Stamping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ryan v. Ald, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Ferd L. Alpert Industries, Inc. v. Oakland Metal Stamping Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gliko v. PermannMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Double AA Corp. v. Newland & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Denton v. First Interstate Bank of CommerceMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lenz v. FSC SecuritiesMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Woodruff v. Bretz, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API