Legal Opinion
Minteq International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 28, 2017No. 16-1276 Consolidated with 16-1335PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge:
In 2012, employer-petitioner Minteq International, Inc. began requiring new employees to sign a Non-Compete and Confidentiality Agreement. The National Labor Relations Board found that Minteq violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act by failing to afford the employees’ union notice or an opportunity to bargain over Minteq’s unilateral implementation of the requirement that employees sign the agreement. We deny Minteq’s petition for review and enforce the Board’s Order.
I
Minteq International, Inc. (“Minteq”) sells the application of its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor RelationsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kaplan v. City of Sugar LandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017