Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of C.M.A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 18, 2003No. A03-773PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*599OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
The State of Minnesota appeals from an order denying its motion to reconsider a prior order dismissing a delinquency petition charging 15-year-old respondent C.M.A with second-degree burglary under Minn.Stat. § 609.582, subd. 2(a) (2002). The district court determined that the delinquency petition lacked probable cause because respondent’s confession was not sufficiently corroborated by independent evidence that the charged offense had been committed, as required by Minn.Stat. § 634.03 (2002).
Because the district court erred in its application of Minn.Stat. § 634.03 and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. KoskelaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Matter of Welfare of M.D.S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. AarsvoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re CMACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State of Minnesota v. Johnathon Brock Mattson-McCartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- State v. HEIGESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. HEIGESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.