Legal Opinion

Stacey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1925No. 200PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This was an action by Charles Stacey against the Fidelity & Casualty Co. and an owner of an automobile, in the Huron Common Pleas, who was insured in the Company. Stacey sought to recover the amount of a judgment awarded him as plaintiff in a personal injury case.

Stacey alleged that James Troyan the owner of the ear drove it so that he received personal injuries and that in the action, he recovered a judgment of $500 which is still in full force and effect. The Company answered that Troy-an was obligated, by the terms of the policy to inform it immediately of any accident, which he did not…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Conold v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. Peeler v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Wood v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API