Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. McGraw-Edison Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1971No. Civ. 35818PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRAMPTON, J. *

Statement of the Case

The minor plaintiff, through her guardian ad litem, by her second amended complaint, sought damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained when a gas heater set fire to her nightgown. She named as defendants McGraw-Edison Company, a corporation (hereafter Mc-Graw), A.. F. Thompson Manufacturing Co., a corporation (hereafter Thompson), The Eastern Isles, Inc., a corporation (hereafter Eastern), James H. Wolfe, individually and doing business as Youngland (hereafter Wolfe), and Mary Anne March (hereafter March).

According to the allegations…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Theatrical Stage Employees Union, Local 16California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Stanley Knapp, Jr. v. North American Rockwell Corporation v. Mrs. Smith's Pie Company, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Hall v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API