Legal Opinion

Battishill v. Humphreys

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1887PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Action on the case for negligence. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, by reason of an accident to her, -July 8, 1884, at Summit-avenue crossing, Spring-wells, near Detroit.

The Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway was at this time •operated by receivers, and the accident is charged to the negligence of their employ és.

Plaintiff was a child about three years of age. Her father -and mother lived on Ferdinand street, a block next west of Summit avenue, and were poor people. The father, at the time of the injury, was away at work, and the mother had .gone down town for groceries. She left the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hartfield v. RoperNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Hargreaves v. DeaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Kefee v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Keyser v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API