Legal Opinion
Stephen David Thompson, and v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, Department of Corrections of the State of California, And
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 21, 1976No. 75-2437PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:
The first problem presented by this appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is whether petitioner has exhausted his state remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). Petitioner was convicted in California on his plea of guilty. No appeal was ever taken from the judgment of conviction. Petitions for writs of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of counsel were presented in California state courts in the following chronological order: the Superior Courts of Monterey County, San Luis Obispo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Michael Ponce Tacho v. Joe MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Philip Charles Kellotat v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary the Attorney General of the State of Oregon, David FrohnmayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Kevin Dale McQuown v. D.J. McCartney WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Nathan Kevin Turner v. Joseph Compoy, Warden, Attorney of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Robert Eldridge Jennison v. B.D. Goldsmith, Warden Attorney General of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.