Legal Opinion
Nathan Kevin Turner v. Joseph Compoy, Warden, Attorney of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1987No. 85-6314PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Nathan Turner, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Turner raises a number of issues, all of which were raised on direct appeal to the California courts. The district court ruled that Turner had failed to exhaust his state court remedies because he had not sought relief by habeas corpus in the state court.
One of the issues raised by Turner is denial of effective assistance of counsel. The California Supreme Court has held that if the record on appeal is insufficient to resolve such a claim, it is more…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. John Waldo Birges, Sr., Terry Lee HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Philip Charles Kellotat v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary the Attorney General of the State of Oregon, David FrohnmayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Fred Lenn Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Michael Ponce Tacho v. Joe MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Frank George Prantil v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Steven Allen Bruni v. Samuel Lewis, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections, Robert Corbin, Attorney General, State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Albert A. Larche v. Mark Simons, Judge Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Eisermann v. PenarosaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.