Dick v. Attorney General
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, C.J.
— Certiorari was granted to review an order directing petitioner, Harold Dick, to comply with a civil investigative demand for production of certain documents under the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86.110.
Petitioner is engaged in the practice of drugless healing in Spokane. On May 9, 1973, he was served by the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General’s office with a civil investigative demand to produce certain records for inspection by their representatives. About 12:10 p.m. on May 11, 1973, an assistant attorney general telephoned petitioner and ascertained that petitioner,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. HouckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Laughney v. MayburyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Ellestad v. SwayzeWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. KelseyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dick v. Attorney GeneralWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- New West Fisheries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Connelly v. Puget Sound Collections, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Howell v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Dick v. Attorney GeneralWashington Supreme Court · 1974