Legal Opinion

Laughney v. Maybury

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1927No. 20523. Department OnePublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

A. M. Laughney is a licensed and practicing osteopathic physician and surgeon of this state. A duly verified complaint charging him with unprofessional conduct, as defined hy Rem. Comp. Stat., § 10063 [P. O. § 4303-10], was filed with the director of licenses of the state. The complaint charged him with exceeding the limit of advertising prescribed by the regulations in that statute in that, in daily newspapers and by means of a pamphlet which was circulated, he engaged in what may be here spoken of as self laudatory, “come to me” advertising, as it is spoken of by the writers on professional…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Northern Cedar Co. v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Coe v. United States District Court for District of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  4. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Ritholz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API