Legal Opinion
Thornton v. Carson
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1975No. 11962PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
We accepted jurisdiction of this petition for special action to consider the constitutionality of Arizona’s replevin statute, A. R.S. § 12-1301 et seq.
The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. On 29 April 1974, the petitioners, drapery manufacturers, entered into a contract with the Industrial Sewing Machine Exchange, Inc., an Arizona corporation, to buy a new U.S. Blindstitch industrial sewing machine, model number 718-9. The price was $670.-80, half to be paid at the time of the contract and the remainder in three monthly installments of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roofing Wholesale Co., Inc. v. PalmerArizona Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. American Credit Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Irrigation & Waterworks Supply v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Wallace v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- First National Bank v. SUPERIOR CT. OF MARICOPA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1975
- First Recreation Corp. v. AmorosoArizona Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.