Legal Opinion
First Recreation Corp. v. Amoroso
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1976No. 12735-PRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
Defendant, First Recreation Corporation, appealed from an order of the trial court which denied First Recreation’s motion to quash a writ of attachment and refused to rule on its motion to quash a writ of garnishment on the basis that the issue raised by that writ was moot. Division Two of the Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part the decision of the Superior Court. Both parties petitioned this court for review which we granted. The opinion of the Court of Appeals, 26 Ariz.App. 477, 549 P.2d 257 (1976) is vacated.
Two questions are presented…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Moss v. Central of Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Huggins v. DeinhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Silverman v. GossettTennessee Supreme Court · 1977