Saxlehner v. Wagner
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the right of the owners of the' Hunyadi Janos Springs to enjoin the sale of artificial Plunyadi water, are stated in the opinion. • Petitioner has always been solicitous in suppressing the use of the Hunyadi name on any artificial products. See Hunyadi Case, 179 U. S. 19; Flower Mills. Co. v: Eagle, 86 Fed. Rep. 608; Thackeray v. Saxlehner, 125 Fed.
Read the full summary
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the right of the owners of the' Hunyadi Janos Springs to enjoin the sale of artificial Plunyadi water, are stated in the opinion. • Petitioner has always been solicitous in suppressing the use of the Hunyadi name on any artificial products. See Hunyadi Case, 179 U. S. 19; Flower Mills. Co. v: Eagle, 86 Fed. Rep. 608; Thackeray v. Saxlehner, 125 Fed. Rep. 911. Appellees’ manufactured product is not artificial Hunyadi water. See work of Count Maillard de Marafy, cited in Singer Mfg. Co. v. June Co., 163…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
The petitioner is the owner of wells'in Budapest from which comes the water known throughout the world by the arbitrary name Hunyadi Janos given to it by her husband. .The respondents make a bitter water in Cincinnati and label it “W. T. Wagner’s Sons Carbonated Artificial Hunyadi Conforming to Fresenius Analysis of Hunyadi Janos Springs.” Formerly they for a time labeled it “W. T. Wagner’s Sons Artificial 'Hunyadi Janos. Ofen Bitter 'Water. Highly Aerated,” but this label had been given up before the bill was brought. The petitioner seeks an injunction against the use of either ‘Hunyadi…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- French Republic v. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Thackeray v. SaxlehnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
3Cited by43 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Calvin Klein Cosmetics Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Pebble Beach Co. v. Tour 18 I Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- R. G. Smith, Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Ta'ron, Inc., and International Fragrances, Inc. v. Chanel, Inc., and Chanel Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.