Legal Opinion
Calvin Klein Cosmetics Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 31, 1987No. 86-5489, 87-5005PublishedCited by 210 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Chief Judge.
Lenox Laboratories (Lenox) appeals from an order granting in part the motion of Calvin Klein Cosmetics Corporation (Calvin Klein) for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the use of certain packaging and display materials in the distribution and sale of Lenox products. 1 Calvin Klein claims that Lenox’s displays and packages infringe on Calvin Klein’s trademark rights in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125. For the reasons stated below, we vacate the preliminary injunction pending trial on the merits.
Calvin Klein sells high-fashion cosmetics, including…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Thompson Medical Company, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Squirtco, Cross-Appellee v. The Seven-Up Company, a Missouri Corporation and Seven-Up U.S.A., Inc., a Missouri Corporation, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- Watkins Incorporated v. Lloyd M. Lewis and Sandra G. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United Industries Corp. v. Clorox Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- General Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown's, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- PLANNED PARENT. MN, N. DAKOTA, S. DAKOTA v. RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Woodsmith Publishing Co. v. Meredith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.