R. G. Smith, Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Ta'ron, Inc., and International Fragrances, Inc. v. Chanel, Inc., and Chanel Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
• Appellant R. G. Smith, doing business as Ta’Ron, Inc., advertised a fragrance called “Second Chance” as a duplicate of appellees’ “Chanel No. 5,” at a fraction of the latter’s price. 1 Appellees were granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting any reference to Chanel No. 5 in the promotion or sale of appellants’ product. 2 This appeal followed.
The action rests upon a single advertisement published in “Specialty Salesmen,” a trade journal directed to wholesale purchasers. The advertisement offered “The Ta’Ron Line of Perfumes” for sale. It gave the seller’s address…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Calvin Klein Cosmetics Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Roho, Incorporated v. Charles Marquis, Individually and D/B/A Chase Air Flotation, and Chase Orthopedic Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- International Order of Job's Daughters v. Lindeburg and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.