Legal Opinion

Northwest Louisiana Fish & Game Preserve Commission v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 31, 2007No. 02-1031LPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

This case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion, pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), for judgment on the pleadings. The defendant, the United States (“defendant” or “government”), contends that the claim filed by the plaintiff, Northwest Louisiana Fish and Game Preserve Commission (“Commission” or “plaintiff’), seeking damages from the government for an alleged taking of its ability to manage the Northwest Louisiana Game and Fish Preserve, should be dismissed under RCFC 12(b)(1) because the court lacks…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northwest Louisiana Fish & Game Preserve Commission v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Entergy Nuclear Fitzpatrick, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Mildenberger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Love Terminal Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API