Legal Opinion

Mildenberger v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 29, 2010No. 06-760 LPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BUSH, Judge.

This takings case is currently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56, and plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, pursuant to RCFC 56. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment is denied, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

In this…

2Cases cited109 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Mildenberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. Dekalb County, Georgia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Etchegoinberry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. In Re Tennessee Valley Authority Ash Spill LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API