Pennsylvania Railroad v. Weber
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR .TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals which affirmed a judgment for damages entered upon a verdict in the District Court, in an action to enforce a reparation order pf the Interstate Commerce Commission. See s. c. 242 U. S. 89.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This cause has been the subject of much and long continued controversy. This is its third appearance in this court. The previous history of the litigation is set out in 242 U. S. 89. The action is based upon a reparation order made by the Interstate Commerce Commission in favor of Jacoby & Company. A recovery was had in the sum awarded by the Commission, with interest. At the first trial plaintiffs did not introduce the record of the testimony before the Commission. The defendant railroad company introduced.testimony tending to show that the Commission in making its award of damages had used…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Clark Bros. Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mills v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. W. F. Jacoby & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Meeker v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. ICCSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- New Jersey Wood Finishing Company v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, and Essexwire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Pittsburgh & W. v. Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.