Ide v. Wamser
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
Negligence as a Matter of Law.
Upon defendant Wamser’s appeal we are urged to hold that Guy Ide was at least SO percent negligent by reason of his defective lookout and his failure to yield the right-of-way. In support of this contention, the defendant Wamser points to our recent decision in Schlueter v. Grady (1963), 20 Wis. (2d) 546, 123 N. W. (2d) 458, where we held that one entering upon an arterial highway may be held negligent as a matter of law in a degree equal to or in excess of a driver who is already traveling on the arterial highway. See also Plog v. Zolper (1957), 1 Wis. (2d) 517,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Murphy v. Martin Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Savina v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Seitz v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Ogle v. AvinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.