Legal Opinion
Ghanooni v. Super Shuttle
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 6, 1992No. B053894PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Plaintiff and her attorney appeal from an order imposing $3,100 in sanctions against them jointly for unsuccessfully opposing a motion to compel compliance with a demand for a physical examination (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2032, subd. (c)(7); 2023, subd. (b)(1).) We dismiss the purported appeal because the order is nonappealable.
Facts and Proceedings Below
The plaintiff, Dalia Ghanooni, is suing defendants Super Shuttle of Los Angeles and others for personal injuries she suffered on board a Super Shuttle passenger van. Plaintiff refused to submit to an X-ray examination of her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Lund v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Rao v. CampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Kohan v. CohanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Calhoun v. Vallejo City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Ghanooni v. Super Shuttle of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Greene v. AmanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Barton v. Ahmanson Developments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Hanna v. BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.