Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Chew

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Cherokee District Court. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Strang, C.:

This ease was tried in the district court of Cherokee county, on May 16,1888, by the court without a jury, on the following agreed statement of facts:

“It is agreed that upon the trial of this cause the following facts shall be taken as true:
“1. That W. H. Chew, one of the defendants above named, is the duly elected, qualified and acting register of deeds of said county; that his term as such commenced January 10, 1888, and that said other defendants G. G. Gregg, Z. H. Loudermilk, and James Murphy are the sureties on the official bond of said defendant Chew, as register of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Bond v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Parker v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. State ex rel. Taylor v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Board of Commissioners v. HinerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Hardy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API