Parker v. Continental Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hatcher, C.:
This action involves the application of the “grace period” provision of the Uniform Policy Act pertaining to policies of accident and sickness insurance.
There is no controversy as to the pleadings, and the facts are not in dispute.
The plaintiff, Floy S. Parker, is a resident of Emporia, Kansas. She is the sole beneficiary of an insurance policy issued by the defendant, Continental Casualty Company, to Wilbern W. Parker, plaintiff’s husband. The policy provided indemnity for loss of life through accidental means. The policy was issued…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. FadelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- State ex rel. Fatzer v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Felten Truck Line, Inc. v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Quality Oil Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Maryland Cas. Co. v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Koch, Administratrix v. Prudential Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Service v. Pyramid Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.