Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1902No. 12,296PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Kingman district court; P. B. Gillett, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, O. J.:

This was an action by the board of county commissioners of Kingman county against Charles B. Hardy, as register of deeds, and the sureties on his official bond, to recover fees collected by *112him and not accounted for as required by chapter 131, Laws of 1897. Judgment went against the defendants, to reverse which they have prosecuted error.

Chapter 131, Laws of 1897 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §§ 3023-3070), is entitled “An act fixing the fees and salaries of certain officers and persons therein named.” It applies principally to county officers. It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Board of Commissioners v. ChewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Board of Comm'rs v. LeahySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SmileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Felten Truck Line, Inc. v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. In re ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Harrod v. Latham Mercantile & Commercial Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API