Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. Kansas City
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided October 7, 1925PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtwood, J.
This proceeding is an information in the nature of quo warranto exhibited by the Attorney-General ex-officio against the present mayor and members of the upper and lower houses of the common council of Kansas City, Missouri. It challenges the validity of the new charter of Kansas City adopted February 24, 1925, and, among other things, charges that respondents “have usurped and now usurp and execute and threaten to execute ’ ’ said new charter.
This charter consists of four hundred and eighty-eight sections. Section 486 thereof provides that Sections 98, 108, 125, 417 to 425 both inclusive,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gabbert v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- State v. LoomisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- City of St. Louis v. DreisoernerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- State ex rel. Bixby v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- State ex rel. Scott v. DirckxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ricks v. Department of State Civil ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Voss v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Fisher v. Reorganized School District No. R-V of Grundy CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. KirbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Gallagher v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.