Legal Opinion

Labrador Oil Co. v. Norton Drilling Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 9, 1999No. 07-99-0246-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Chief Justice.

In this proceeding, appellants Mark McKinley and Mike Kerr challenge an order of the trial court denying their motion to sever appellee Norton Drilling Company’s claims against them individually, from the claims appellee asserts against Labrador Oil Company (Labrador). In presenting their challenge, appellants present one issue in which they contend there is no basis in law or in the record to allow or permit a joinder of the claims against them with those against Labrador. We dismiss this appeal.

Norton Drilling presents a two-fold response to appellants’ issue. They first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Monsanto Co. v. Cornerstones Municipal Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. AbelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Harris County District Attorney's Office v. J.T.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United North & South Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'QUINN v. Hall, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  2. In re JobeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. in Re: John M. O'quinn, John M. O'quinn, P.C., D/B/A O'Quinn & Laminack, John M. O'Quinn and Associates, L.L. P., and John M. O'Quinn Law Firm, P.L.L.c, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API