Legal Opinion
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United North & South Development Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1942No. 8012PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander
This is a garnishment proceeding ancillary to the main suit this day decided by us in the case of Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Edgar B. Davis, 140 Texas 398, 168 S. W. (2d) 216.
The Court of Civil Appeals stated the facts of this case and its holding on the principal point involved therein as follows:
*419“This garnishment suit or proceeding is ancillary to Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Edgar B. Davis, 160 S. W. (2d) 543 this day decided by this court, (Ante p. 398) and wherein a full statement of the nature and result of the litigation is made. Suffice it to say here that in this ancillary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Shipley v. Floydada Independent School Dist.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Buerger v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Commonwealth of Mass. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Wooters v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Sorokolit v. RhodesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Monsanto Co. v. Cornerstones Municipal Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Sexton v. Mount Olivet Cemetery Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- In Re Alford Chevrolet-GeoTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.