Legal Opinion

Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1999No. 98-0592PublishedCited by 250 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

This case presents several issues concerning section 15.003 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Section 15.003 limits when a plaintiff may join an action in a venue that would otherwise be improper for that plaintiff. Here, 104 plaintiffs who could not independently establish venue in Bexar County attempted to join two plaintiffs in a Bexar County action against makers of silicone-gel breast implants. Concluding that the 104 plaintiffs were improperly joined, the trial court granted the defendants’ motion to transfer venue of those plaintiffs’ claims. A divided court of appeals…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Polaris Investment Management Corp. v. AbascalTexas Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by250 opinions

  1. Thomas v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Brown v. ToddTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re DoeTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. American Home Products Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P. v. Justiss, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006

245 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API