Legal Opinion

Webber v. International Paper Co.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 9, 2004No. 02-63-B-SPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL

SINGAL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Gary Webber sued International Paper Company (“IP”) alleging that his dismissal as part of a reduction in force was motivated by his disability, in violation of the Maine Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), 5 M.R.S.A. § 4551-4634. The action was removed to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. At trial, a jury found for Mr. Webber and awarded compensatory and punitive damages, which the Court subsequently reduced to $300,000…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Smith v. F.W. Morse Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. Alberto Dominguez-Cruz and Nydia Negron-Ramos v. Suttle Caribe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Webber v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Oakstone v. Postmaster GeneralDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  3. Venable v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.District Court, D. Maine · 2009
  4. Lakshman v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEMDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  5. Oakstone v. Postmaster GeneralDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API