Legal Opinion
Lakshman v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 6, 2004No. CV-03-52-B-WPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
On August 5, 2004, this Court issued an Order granting Defendant University of Maine System’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 On August 15, 2004, Plaintiff Dilip K. Lakshman filed a Motion to Alter or Amend Summary Judgment Order Pursuant to Rule 59(e). Because the Court already considered and ruled against the Plaintiff on the issues the Plaintiff presents, this Court denies his motion.
The Plaintiff lists three bases: 2(1) the “mixed motive” Desert Palace analysis and the “pretext” McDonnell Douglas…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Evelyn Hancock v. City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- National Metal Finishing Company, Inc. v. Barclaysamerican/commercial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. Verso Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2015
- BEERS v. MENTOR ABI LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
- Cathy Estrella v. PNF Realty, Inc., and Peter N. FlorosDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2026