Legal Opinion

Cottle v. Oregon Mutual Life Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1939No. 6623PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AILSHIE, C. J. —

Respondent Oregon Mutual Life Insurance Company is successor to the Oregon Life Insurance .Company and was incorporated under the laws of Oregon. Respondent Schuppel had been the general agent of the company.

January 7, 1928, appellant entered into an agreement with the Oregon Life Insurance Co., whereby he was to canvass for applications for life insurance; the contract provided for payment of 5 per cent renewal commission on cash annual premiums on $50,000 or more of approved first-year business “for nine policy years after the first,” subject to certain limitations and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cook-Reynolds Co. v. BeyerMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kelley v. BaischIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pollard Oil Co. v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Chick v. TomlinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Allen v. Ruby Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Commercial Credit Corp. v. S & E ENTERPRISES, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. United Mercury Mines Company, a Corporation v. Bradley Mining Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API