Legal Opinion

Allen v. Ruby Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1964No. 9191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Chief Justice.

Under date of May 9, 1951, plaintiff s-respondents, D. K. Allen and Mary R. Allen, husband and wife, as lessors, entered into a mining lease with Warren Dredging Corporation, as lessee, whereby the lessee was granted the exclusive right during a period of twenty years to mine and extract from the leased premises, consisting of 160 acres, all minerals, ores, sands and mining products.

Under the terms of the lease the lessee agreed to pay to the lessors, as mining royalty, a sum of money equivalent to 10% of the net sales returns received from all mining products recovered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. PaddockIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Lundin v. Hallmark Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Cottle v. Oregon Mutual Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Twin Falls Orchard & Fruit Co. v. SalsburyIdaho Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bennett v. BlissIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Madrid v. RothIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. ParteeIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API