Legal Opinion

Pollard Oil Co. v. Christensen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1982No. 13343PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

The instant appeal arises from an action filed by Pollard Oil Company against Val and Naomi Christensen for payment of principal and accrued interest allegedly due and owing on two promissory notes executed by the Christensens. In their answer and counterclaim, the Christensens sought damages on two counts of breach of contract and treble damages on two counts of anti-trust violations. The district court entered judgment in favor of Pollard Oil Company, and declined to grant relief to the Christensens on their counterclaim. We affirm.

During the summer of 1971, Dean Pollard,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pocatello Industrial Park Co. v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Werry v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Application of Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Clark v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Dale's Service Company, Inc. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. O'Connor v. Harger Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. DeLancey v. DeLanceyIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Woodvine v. Triangle Dairy, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Indian Springs LLC v. Indian Springs Land Investment, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API