Legal Opinion

Garber v. Martin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*411DENEGUE, J.

The plaintiff recovered a verdict in his personal injury action. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for new trial. Plaintiff appeals.

One of the grounds for new trial was the injection of insurance on cross-examination by a witness called by defendants. The trial court, when granting the new trial, stated that when the four grounds urged to be the basis for the motion for new trial were considered together, “and particularly the injection of insurance into the case, even though involuntarily done, it is my opinion that defendants did not get a fair trial * * *."

When the fact…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Johnson v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Wells v. MorrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. DeSpain v. BohlkeOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rigelman v. GilliganOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Snyder v. Hunter Room, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Lunski v. LindemannOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API