Legal Opinion

Lunski v. Lindemann

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and defendant’s automobile. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $52,500. Defendant appeals from the resulting judgment. We affirm.

Defendant’s principal contention is that the trial court erred in rejecting an offer of proof that at the time of the accident plaintiff, then 15 years of age, “did not have a valid Oregon operator’s license” with the “motorcycle endorsement thereon.” ①

Thus, defendant contends that plaintiff’s “act of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Staples v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Guthrie v. MullerOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Henthorne v. HopwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Bristol Associates, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Girard Trust BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Klanseck v. Anderson Sales & Service, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Stovall v. PeriusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Hogan v. GridelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Benton v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API