Legal Opinion

Rigelman v. Gilligan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1973PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for personal injuries received in an automobile accident. Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile which collided at an intersection with an automobile being driven by defendant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the resulting judgment. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s only assignments of error are that the trial court erred in denying the request of plaintiff’s attorney, upon commencing the cross-examination of defendant, that his attorney produce copies of statements given by the defendant for use in cross-examination.

In support of these…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Albrecht v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Smith v. Pacific Truck ExpressOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Gallagher v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dinter v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  2. Elam v. SoaresOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. JohanesenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Davis v. County of ClackamasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Stoeger v. Burlington Northern RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API