Legal Opinion

Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education of Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 11, 1986PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rubin, J.

The question presented is whether, absent a contract requirement, certain probationary teachers represented by the petitioner may be compelled, as a condition of receiving tenure, to submit themselves to investigatory urine tests to detect the use of controlled substances, even though there is no indication that any one of such teachers uses, or ever has used, illegal drugs. We conclude that such compulsory testing constitutes a search within the meaning of the US Constitution 4th Amendment, and that to compel a probationary teacher to undergo such a search…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McDonell v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Knox County Education Association v. Knox County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. American Federation of Government Employees v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1986
  5. Feliciano v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API