Legal Opinion
Harrell v. Pineland Plantation, Ltd.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 22, 1999No. 25016PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOAL, Justice:
This case involves a tort suit brought by respondent William Harrell (“Harrell”) against petitioner Pineland Plantation, Ltd. (“Pineland”). The trial court dismissed Harrell’s complaint. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case for trial. Pineland appeals the decision of the Court of Appeals. We affirm in result.
*318Factual/Procedural Background
Pineland is a California limited partnership. Haynes Kendall (“Kendall”) is Pineland’s general partner. Pineland’s only enterprise is ownership and operation of a 275-acre plantation in Colleton County that Kendall maintains as a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Vernon v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Glass v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Bickley Ex Rel. Estate of Bickley v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Owings v. Anderson County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Parker Wideman v. Innovative Fibers LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Edens v. BelliniCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Sallie Zeigler v. Eastman Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Posey v. Proper Mold & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- South Carolina Uninsured Employer's Fund v. HouseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.