Legal Opinion

Owings v. Anderson County Sheriff's Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 9, 1993No. 23912PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

In this workers’ compensation case, the Commission denied the employee benefits, finding his unstable angina was not causally related to his employment. We affirm.

FACTS

The claimant, Owings, was diagnosed with early atherosclerotic disease and angina in 1982. At that time, it was noted that Owings was at a “very great risk for developing progressive narrowing and clinically significant coronary artery disease.” In March of 1988, Owings began working for the sheriffs department. On November 30, 1988, Owings participated in physical training at the Law Enforcement Academy, which is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bickley Ex Rel. Estate of Bickley v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  2. Carter v. Penney Tire and Recapping Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Walsh v. U. S. Rubber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Brown v. R. L. Jordan Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rodney v. Michelin Tire Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Broughton v. South of the BorderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Gray v. Club Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Harrell v. Pineland Plantation, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Baggott v. Southern Music, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API