Legal Opinion
Krulikowski v. Polycast Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 25, 1966PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The several plaintiffs own and occupy residences in an industrial zone in Stamford. The defendant, under a lease, has, since 1955, occupied two industrial-type, one-story buildings in that industrial zone, adjacent to and immediately north of the residences owned and occupied by the plaintiffs. The defendant has been engaged in manufacturing a product called “Polycast,” a clear, transparent substance whose characteristics and functions are comparable to the more commonly known product called plexiglass. The product is manufactured by means of polymerization of an acrylic ester called methyl…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Walkinshaw v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Nailor v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Cyr v. Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Welles v. RhodesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Filisko v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Shulman v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Kostyal v. CassSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Adams v. VaillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.