Legal Opinion

Kurylas, Inc. v. Bradsky

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1990No. 16594PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBBERPUHL, Circuit Judge.

Kurylas, Inc. (Kurylas) appeals from a summary judgment entered against it in its action for damages allegedly arising from an attorney/client relationship with Walter J. Bradsky (Bradsky). We affirm.

Kurylas’ complaint in this case alleged damage from a conversion suit brought against it by Rushmore State Bank. See Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc., 424 N.W.2d 649 (S.D.1988). A $83,711.58 judgment was entered against Kurylas and in favor of Rushmore State Bank. Kurylas also incurred a large amount of attorney’s fees due to the conversion suit and other matters.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Alberts v. GiebinkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Conard v. WaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Conway v. ConwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API