Kurylas, Inc. v. Bradsky
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DOBBERPUHL, Circuit Judge.
Kurylas, Inc. (Kurylas) appeals from a summary judgment entered against it in its action for damages allegedly arising from an attorney/client relationship with Walter J. Bradsky (Bradsky). We affirm.
Kurylas’ complaint in this case alleged damage from a conversion suit brought against it by Rushmore State Bank. See Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc., 424 N.W.2d 649 (S.D.1988). A $83,711.58 judgment was entered against Kurylas and in favor of Rushmore State Bank. Kurylas also incurred a large amount of attorney’s fees due to the conversion suit and other matters.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Alberts v. GiebinkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Conard v. WaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Conway v. ConwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.