Legal Opinion
Cox v. Sprung's Transport & Movers, Ltd.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 11, 2006No. C.A. 8:05-3264-HMHPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HERLONG, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Brian Cox’s (“Cox”) motion to remand and Sprung’s Transport & Movers, Ltd. (“Sprung’s”) and Ian Bamstead’s (“Bamstead”) (collectively “Defendants”) motion to set aside entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 For the reasons below, the court denies Cox’s motion to remand and grants the Defendants’ motion to set aside entry of default.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This lawsuit arises from a motor vehicle accident in which Cox was injured when a vehicle he was operating…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Nasser MoradiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Lolatchy v. Arthur Murray, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Skidaway Associates, Ltd. v. Glens Falls InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1990
- Hawes v. Cart Products, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2005
- Colleton Preparatory Academy, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Renaissance Marketing, Inc. v. Monitronics International, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
- Burton v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2006
- Aiken v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
- Davis v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2024
- Demary v. Jim Hudson Buick GMC Cadillac, IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023